Last edited: 11 May 2018
|
A major disadvantage of traditional charcoal production is the low efficiency with which the energy of the wood used is converted into energy of charcoal. If one kilogram of charcoal with a calorific value of 30 kJ/kg is produced from 6 to 12 kg of wood with a calorific value of 15 kJ/ kg then this corresponds to an efficiency of 17% to 33%. Thus most of the energy contained in the wood is lost during traditional charcoal production. If the efficiency of the improved charcoal stove is 30%, then in total (related to the calorific value of the wood used) only 5% to 10% is effective i.e. absorbed from the pot. In comparison, fuelwood can be used directly, with efficiencies up to about 50%. Then only a small amount of firewood is necessary for the same task.
The fundamental problem, however, is that the traditional charcoal production causes logging of naturally grown trees. The traditional charcoal business is mainly depending on the "free" provision of the trees and the refusal of the provision for environmental and climate damage. Would these costs be added to the price of the charcoal, it would be the end of this billion-dollar market. It should be noted that this market is financed by poor households. From price increases due to the shrinking forest resources, poor households are particularly vulnerable when they depend on charcoal.[2]
Reports[]
- September 2016: Holzkohle in Afrika und ARTIS-Institutes - Dieter Seifert
- June 2016: Traditional Charcoal in Africa and Need of African Institutes (ARTIS) - Dieter Seifert
Articles in the media[]
- May 2018: Champion of the Earth Fatima Jibrell attends high-level talks on Somalia’s illegal charcoal trade - UNDP
- July 2016: Africa’s Charcoal Economy Is Cooking. The Trees Are Paying - New York Times
- September 2009: Africa's burning charcoal problem - Focus on Africa